Hawaii's legislature is considering a bill response to the Hawaii Supreme Court's rail decision holding that before construction can proceed an AIS study must be conducted for the entirety of a project even when (as in the case of rail), the construction is planned to be done in phases.
Reports of this bill imply that this would effect some kind of revolution
The Supreme Court issued its opinion today on the licensing matter. Bottom line: the court remanded the case back to the licensing board for a determination of whether the jalousie removal and installation work on the protested job at issue was “incidental and supplemental” to the renovation job as a whole, in light of the
The ICA issued its decision on the duty to defend portion of the pending Group Builders appeal.
Bottom line on the crucial issue of whether the ICA would revisit or reexamine its decision that construction defects can never be "occurrences" and therefore cannot trigger insurance coverage:
1. The court noted its prior finding that construction defects
In Holcomb Condo. Homeowners' Ass'n v. Venture, 2013 Nev. LEXIS 24 (April 14, 2013), available here, the court considered the effect of an arbitration agreement made part of the purchase agreements for the condominium. The arbitration agreement was attached to the purchase agreement, but stated that it was a part of and incorporated into
I will leave this to Tred to expound upon at insurance law blog but wanted to note a new case from North Dakota, K & L Homes v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 ND 57; 2013 N.D. LEXIS 61, April 5, 2013. Link to the case here. Briefly, court was asked to consider
In Miner Dederick Constr. v. Gulf Chem. & Metallurgical Corp., 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 4589 (April 11, 2013), the Texas Court of Appeals was asked to review a trial court's consideration and rejection of a spoliation claim brought by a defendant to a construction defect action. In the case the contractor defendant (Miner) was charged
On a summary judgment motion, a U.S.D.C. court out of South Dakota addressed the question of a subcontractor who contracted for undefined quantities of work on a lump sum basis, then performed over 50% more work than the parties originally contemplated. The case is United States ex rel. Black Hills Hydro-Turf, Inc…, 2012 U.S.
In Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Centex,, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50460, April 8, 2013, a U.S.D.C. case out of California, a developer (Centex) involved in a multiple construction defect suits, filed claims against its insured, Travelers, for its failure to provide a timely defense to the claims. Centex and Travelers filed
Rendering of the ThirtyMeter Telescope from http://www.tmt.org/news-center/new-renderings-reveal-planned-design-tmt
California and Canadian university plans to construct the world's largest telescope, the thirty meter telescope, atop the summit of Mauna Kea, won approval from the Department of Land and Natural Resources on Friday. The decision allows the thirty meter telescope project to negotiate a sublease with the University
In B&B Contrs. & Developers, Inc. v. Olsavsky Jaminet Architects, Inc., 984 N.E.2d 419 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012), available here, the Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part a verdict in favor of a contractor against its own architect. The contractor built an ice rink pursuant to a design build